<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Final Day at Collaborate&#8217;06, and Setting Up Siebel Analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/04/28/final-day-at-collaborate06-and-setting-up-siebel-analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/04/28/final-day-at-collaborate06-and-setting-up-siebel-analytics/</link>
	<description>Delivered Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:54:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/04/28/final-day-at-collaborate06-and-setting-up-siebel-analytics/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp2/2006/04/28/final-day-at-collaborate06-and-setting-up-siebel-analytics/#comment-904</guid>
		<description>I agree the general focus of the BI area this year was on the Oracle BI tools. But there were a few very good presentations on the data warehouse design, modeling, ETL and tuning areas and the attendees were more interested on those presentations than the ones on BI tools. I saw more than 250 people in the conference rooms for the presentations by Ian Abramson, Vincent Chazhoor and Ben Bor.  I attended a few presentations on the discoverer/tools side also and there were not many people in those rooms in most of the cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the general focus of the BI area this year was on the Oracle BI tools. But there were a few very good presentations on the data warehouse design, modeling, ETL and tuning areas and the attendees were more interested on those presentations than the ones on BI tools. I saw more than 250 people in the conference rooms for the presentations by Ian Abramson, Vincent Chazhoor and Ben Bor.  I attended a few presentations on the discoverer/tools side also and there were not many people in those rooms in most of the cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/04/28/final-day-at-collaborate06-and-setting-up-siebel-analytics/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 06:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp2/2006/04/28/final-day-at-collaborate06-and-setting-up-siebel-analytics/#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Hi there,
To be honest, I didn&#8217;t really get to see many papers, or go to many talks, other than the ones I reported on. Doing three presentations myself, much of the time between presentations was taken up by practicing, going through slides and so on. So I didn&#8217;t really get to see if there were any other talks on data warehousing.
One talk I did got to was George Lumpkin&#8217;s one on data warehousing architectures. I&#8217;d read the slides from the previous time he&#8217;d run it at Open World, and I was curious to know what his rationale was, how he was doing away with the ODS and so forth. But no, I can&#8217;t really comment on why there were so few DW papers (if indeed there were) as I didn&#8217;t get a chance to go to many talks other than my ones or the BI tools ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,<br />
To be honest, I didn&#38;#8217;t really get to see many papers, or go to many talks, other than the ones I reported on. Doing three presentations myself, much of the time between presentations was taken up by practicing, going through slides and so on. So I didn&#38;#8217;t really get to see if there were any other talks on data warehousing.<br />
One talk I did got to was George Lumpkin&#38;#8217;s one on data warehousing architectures. I&#38;#8217;d read the slides from the previous time he&#38;#8217;d run it at Open World, and I was curious to know what his rationale was, how he was doing away with the ODS and so forth. But no, I can&#38;#8217;t really comment on why there were so few DW papers (if indeed there were) as I didn&#38;#8217;t get a chance to go to many talks other than my ones or the BI tools ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/04/28/final-day-at-collaborate06-and-setting-up-siebel-analytics/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp2/2006/04/28/final-day-at-collaborate06-and-setting-up-siebel-analytics/#comment-902</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,
   What do you think about the papers in data warehousing area this year?.  I got a feeling that the focus of most of the papers are on discoverer and analytic tools rather than the database side.  Oracle is mainly used as a database for data warehouse and the anlytical side is not very &#8216;mature&#8217;.  I can understand if this happens in the Oracle Open world.  But it was rather strange to see it in IOUG.  Could use please comment on the papers on the non-analytical area and why there are not any papers on that area this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,<br />
   What do you think about the papers in data warehousing area this year?.  I got a feeling that the focus of most of the papers are on discoverer and analytic tools rather than the database side.  Oracle is mainly used as a database for data warehouse and the anlytical side is not very &#38;#8216;mature&#38;#8217;.  I can understand if this happens in the Oracle Open world.  But it was rather strange to see it in IOUG.  Could use please comment on the papers on the non-analytical area and why there are not any papers on that area this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
