<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/</link>
	<description>Delivered Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:47:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Noons</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/comment-page-1/#comment-4319</link>
		<dc:creator>Noons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/#comment-4319</guid>
		<description>Well, I left Mark a message a while ago that there was some problem with his blogs and fora that prevented folsk from loging in.  Could be something related to Firefox as the browser?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I left Mark a message a while ago that there was some problem with his blogs and fora that prevented folsk from loging in.  Could be something related to Firefox as the browser?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/comment-page-1/#comment-4318</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/#comment-4318</guid>
		<description>A small update on this. I tried to register for the forum to answer one of the questions but found that Mark didn&#039;t verify my account. I emailed him and it turns out he&#039;s not been getting the account verification emails.

Perhaps that&#039;s why there aren&#039;t more contributors ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A small update on this. I tried to register for the forum to answer one of the questions but found that Mark didn&#8217;t verify my account. I emailed him and it turns out he&#8217;s not been getting the account verification emails.</p>
<p>Perhaps that&#8217;s why there aren&#8217;t more contributors ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/comment-page-1/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/#comment-4317</guid>
		<description>Pete / Mark,

The first point is that, despite the fact that I&#039;m sure Mark advertised the existence of the forum, it didn&#039;t really stick in my mind (not much does these days) so I&#039;ve just had my first quick visit.

The first thing I noticed when I visited was that there was a question or two that I might be able to offer a response to.

The second, looking at the questions, is that DW questions tend to be *very* specific and often about a specific reporting tool. If I haven&#039;t used Discoverer lately, I can&#039;t help there, if someone is interested in Siebel Analytics etc. etc. There are so many diverse products that core questions are fewer. The very fact that Oracle&#039;s BI strategy is a constant topic of debate is indicative of the fragmentation in this domain.

If you look at the Dizwell forum, the questions with most responses are probably about core server functionality because more people have understanding of that. i.e. Although the Oracle server might be a complex product, it&#039;s one product. The fragmentation in the BI world makes each site quite individual and the number of possible responders fewer.

For what it&#039;s worth, I&#039;d be tempted to give it one last throw of the dice, with a blog to draw a bit more attention to it.

[joke]... and if all you DW types would stop your funny hand-shakes and strange database designs, you might get some &#039;straight&#039; database people involved[/joke]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete / Mark,</p>
<p>The first point is that, despite the fact that I&#8217;m sure Mark advertised the existence of the forum, it didn&#8217;t really stick in my mind (not much does these days) so I&#8217;ve just had my first quick visit.</p>
<p>The first thing I noticed when I visited was that there was a question or two that I might be able to offer a response to.</p>
<p>The second, looking at the questions, is that DW questions tend to be *very* specific and often about a specific reporting tool. If I haven&#8217;t used Discoverer lately, I can&#8217;t help there, if someone is interested in Siebel Analytics etc. etc. There are so many diverse products that core questions are fewer. The very fact that Oracle&#8217;s BI strategy is a constant topic of debate is indicative of the fragmentation in this domain.</p>
<p>If you look at the Dizwell forum, the questions with most responses are probably about core server functionality because more people have understanding of that. i.e. Although the Oracle server might be a complex product, it&#8217;s one product. The fragmentation in the BI world makes each site quite individual and the number of possible responders fewer.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I&#8217;d be tempted to give it one last throw of the dice, with a blog to draw a bit more attention to it.</p>
<p>[joke]&#8230; and if all you DW types would stop your funny hand-shakes and strange database designs, you might get some &#8217;straight&#8217; database people involved[/joke]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete_S</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/comment-page-1/#comment-4316</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/#comment-4316</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark

As soon as I posted on my blog I thought, &quot;perhaps I should have dropped Mark a note first&quot; But it does erk me that you go the extra mile and try to start up something and others just don&#039;t take up the challenge. So I hoped that you would find what I put a fair reflection of where things are at.

I suppose there is another reason why people don&#039;t contribute - perhaps there is a fear of stepping into your territory, or perhaps that of SolstonePlus - after all most people don&#039;t work for you!

But that said, you are right, a good argument is something missing from the BI community - it could be related to keeping &#039;trade secrets&#039; or a corporate desire to avoid contention - that could well apply to me as for example my blogging is tolerated by my employers providing I do not generate disrepute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark</p>
<p>As soon as I posted on my blog I thought, &#8220;perhaps I should have dropped Mark a note first&#8221; But it does erk me that you go the extra mile and try to start up something and others just don&#8217;t take up the challenge. So I hoped that you would find what I put a fair reflection of where things are at.</p>
<p>I suppose there is another reason why people don&#8217;t contribute &#8211; perhaps there is a fear of stepping into your territory, or perhaps that of SolstonePlus &#8211; after all most people don&#8217;t work for you!</p>
<p>But that said, you are right, a good argument is something missing from the BI community &#8211; it could be related to keeping &#8216;trade secrets&#8217; or a corporate desire to avoid contention &#8211; that could well apply to me as for example my blogging is tolerated by my employers providing I do not generate disrepute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/comment-page-1/#comment-4315</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/#comment-4315</guid>
		<description>Hi Pete

A couple of observations.

Firstly, I think Howard&#039;s forum has prospered as he&#039;s put a lot of effort into building a community around his site, something that I&#039;ve not had enough spare time to do. Forums like his don&#039;t just happen by accident, they need nurturing and I&#039;ve just not had the time, unfortunately.

Also, however - and you&#039;d have seen this at the UKOUG BI event the other week - the BI community don&#039;t seem to be up for debate or discussion us much as say, server tech, hence you don&#039;t seem to get the sort of to-and-fro debate that you seem to get on DBMS sites. And, as you say, there isn&#039;t such a philosophy around &#039;sharing&#039; information, whether it&#039;s down to lack of confidence, or something else, I&#039;m not sure. What it does mean though is that there&#039;s a lot of unanswered questions on the forum, which bugs me as I feel I should answer them, but what with family and so on, again I just don&#039;t have the time.

cheers

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pete</p>
<p>A couple of observations.</p>
<p>Firstly, I think Howard&#8217;s forum has prospered as he&#8217;s put a lot of effort into building a community around his site, something that I&#8217;ve not had enough spare time to do. Forums like his don&#8217;t just happen by accident, they need nurturing and I&#8217;ve just not had the time, unfortunately.</p>
<p>Also, however &#8211; and you&#8217;d have seen this at the UKOUG BI event the other week &#8211; the BI community don&#8217;t seem to be up for debate or discussion us much as say, server tech, hence you don&#8217;t seem to get the sort of to-and-fro debate that you seem to get on DBMS sites. And, as you say, there isn&#8217;t such a philosophy around &#8217;sharing&#8217; information, whether it&#8217;s down to lack of confidence, or something else, I&#8217;m not sure. What it does mean though is that there&#8217;s a lot of unanswered questions on the forum, which bugs me as I feel I should answer them, but what with family and so on, again I just don&#8217;t have the time.</p>
<p>cheers</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thierry</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/comment-page-1/#comment-4314</link>
		<dc:creator>thierry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/2006/05/29/forum/#comment-4314</guid>
		<description>and in the Oracle apps communities i see even less that sharing and contribution attitude. I guess has to do with the total number of people involved, and &#039;stability&#039; (and age) of the domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and in the Oracle apps communities i see even less that sharing and contribution attitude. I guess has to do with the total number of people involved, and &#8217;stability&#8217; (and age) of the domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
