<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Database problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/01/20/database-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/01/20/database-problems/</link>
	<description>Delivered Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:54:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/01/20/database-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-4415</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/01/20/database-problems/#comment-4415</guid>
		<description>By taking a set of failing queries we managed to establish that the problem was associated with star transformations that used temporary disk storage (the in-memory ones worked OK). Oracle support are working with us on filing a bug report.

The work around of no star transforms caused severe performance problems, and the more acceptable work around of disabling the use of disk based transforms highlighted a parallel query bug, for a small minority of problem queries.

We&#039;ll get this one cracked... soon???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By taking a set of failing queries we managed to establish that the problem was associated with star transformations that used temporary disk storage (the in-memory ones worked OK). Oracle support are working with us on filing a bug report.</p>
<p>The work around of no star transforms caused severe performance problems, and the more acceptable work around of disabling the use of disk based transforms highlighted a parallel query bug, for a small minority of problem queries.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll get this one cracked&#8230; soon???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/01/20/database-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-4414</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/01/20/database-problems/#comment-4414</guid>
		<description>For now completely disabled. We are working up a test case that will check whether we can  use star transforms without the temporary tables.

I have a feeling that we are pushing star transformations a bit too hard - we are using the transformations on  &lt;i&gt;snowflake&lt;/i&gt; schemas three or four levels deep (don&#039;t ask!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For now completely disabled. We are working up a test case that will check whether we can  use star transforms without the temporary tables.</p>
<p>I have a feeling that we are pushing star transformations a bit too hard &#8211; we are using the transformations on  <i>snowflake</i> schemas three or four levels deep (don&#8217;t ask!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Aldridge</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/01/20/database-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-4413</link>
		<dc:creator>David Aldridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/01/20/database-problems/#comment-4413</guid>
		<description>Did you completely disable star transformations Pete, or just the temp table bit? I remember that causing problems before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you completely disable star transformations Pete, or just the temp table bit? I remember that causing problems before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
