<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running OWB10gR2 in a Production Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/</link>
	<description>Delivered Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:12:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rajesh p</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-2151</link>
		<dc:creator>rajesh p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 06:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp2/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/#comment-2151</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Its great to have a look at your Blog which is very informative about OWB. I have one question about the deployment of OWB code. What are the steps that i should take while exporting the MDL file from one machine to another ? Is it enough to export the MDL and then import it on the new system ? Or is there anything in addition to that to be done ?

Thanks in advance,
rajesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Its great to have a look at your Blog which is very informative about OWB. I have one question about the deployment of OWB code. What are the steps that i should take while exporting the MDL file from one machine to another ? Is it enough to export the MDL and then import it on the new system ? Or is there anything in addition to that to be done ?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance,<br />
rajesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rittman Mead Consulting &#187; Using OWB10gR2 in a Production Environment &#8230; Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-2150</link>
		<dc:creator>Rittman Mead Consulting &#187; Using OWB10gR2 in a Production Environment &#8230; Revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp2/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/#comment-2150</guid>
		<description>[...] Running OWB10gR2 in a Production Environment  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Running OWB10gR2 in a Production Environment  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Broughton</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-2149</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Broughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp2/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/#comment-2149</guid>
		<description>Mark,

    Much as I might like for my employer to ship me off to Edinburgh for the conference, I&#039;m frankly stuck here in pergatory..... (errr - well Ottawa rather) ... for the duration.

   So will you be posting any documentation of that presentation either at the UKOUG site or here for us poor sods who won&#039;t get to have a pint along the Royal Mile anytime soon? We&#039;re just ramping up with OWB10R2, so I&#039;m trying to read any real-world hints that I can get my grubby fingers on - especially as it relates to version control, deployment strategies, and (most critically) security issues.


Cheers,
   Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>    Much as I might like for my employer to ship me off to Edinburgh for the conference, I&#8217;m frankly stuck here in pergatory&#8230;.. (errr &#8211; well Ottawa rather) &#8230; for the duration.</p>
<p>   So will you be posting any documentation of that presentation either at the UKOUG site or here for us poor sods who won&#8217;t get to have a pint along the Royal Mile anytime soon? We&#8217;re just ramping up with OWB10R2, so I&#8217;m trying to read any real-world hints that I can get my grubby fingers on &#8211; especially as it relates to version control, deployment strategies, and (most critically) security issues.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
   Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-2148</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp2/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/#comment-2148</guid>
		<description>Holger,

An excellent point about multi-configurations, thank you for pointing this out. As you say, you can switch which control center the default configuration is associated with, and you can manually switch the module locations, which gives you the ability, without the Enterprise ETL Option, to run mappings on other databases.

This actually puts the multi-configuration feature in a different light - instead of it being essential and therefore something that would make you have to always license the Enterprise ETL Option, now it&#039;s just something that makes life easer for you. You might still argue that multi-configuration support should be a free, built in feature, but given that the alternative, manual approach is what we&#039;ve always had in the past, and that all the new functionality in 10gR2 has ended up in the pay-extra options anyway, it&#039;s not as bad a situation as before. Thanks for pointing it out, that&#039;s why I always like to publish this sort of stuff for review in the first place.

Also (and this is to Norbert as well) - yes, OMB*Plus scripting is the key to fast, efficient and error-free deployment across environments. It&#039;s not something I&#039;ve directly worked with myself, but I have colleagues that have scripted similar things in the past and I&#039;ll try and get hold of some code examples in time for the presentation.

Thanks for the feedback

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holger,</p>
<p>An excellent point about multi-configurations, thank you for pointing this out. As you say, you can switch which control center the default configuration is associated with, and you can manually switch the module locations, which gives you the ability, without the Enterprise ETL Option, to run mappings on other databases.</p>
<p>This actually puts the multi-configuration feature in a different light &#8211; instead of it being essential and therefore something that would make you have to always license the Enterprise ETL Option, now it&#8217;s just something that makes life easer for you. You might still argue that multi-configuration support should be a free, built in feature, but given that the alternative, manual approach is what we&#8217;ve always had in the past, and that all the new functionality in 10gR2 has ended up in the pay-extra options anyway, it&#8217;s not as bad a situation as before. Thanks for pointing it out, that&#8217;s why I always like to publish this sort of stuff for review in the first place.</p>
<p>Also (and this is to Norbert as well) &#8211; yes, OMB*Plus scripting is the key to fast, efficient and error-free deployment across environments. It&#8217;s not something I&#8217;ve directly worked with myself, but I have colleagues that have scripted similar things in the past and I&#8217;ll try and get hold of some code examples in time for the presentation.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holger Friedrich</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>Holger Friedrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp2/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>Hello Mark,

I&#039;d like to add one more aspect of dealing with complex multi-stage development processes. It&#039;s &#039;script based deployment&#039;. In complex environments, where the operations guys are properly seprated from development, and where standard deployment procedures are in place, often enough direct tool access to the production system is forbidden. Therefore building, delivering, and deploying script based release packages is essential.

Fortunately, OWB provides the ability to do this, due to its OMB*Plus scripting interface. And that&#039;s even free of charge, as long as you do not call Enterprise functionality of course. ;)

A note regarding deployment to multiple target systems and the use of configurations. You can target several (run-time) control centers i.e. target systems with one configuration. You just have to switch the configuration&#039;s associated control center. The painful part, of course is, that you have to switch all the actual module locations everytime you want to deploy to another system too. However, you do not have to use Enterprise functionality this way.

Regards Holger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mark,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to add one more aspect of dealing with complex multi-stage development processes. It&#8217;s &#8217;script based deployment&#8217;. In complex environments, where the operations guys are properly seprated from development, and where standard deployment procedures are in place, often enough direct tool access to the production system is forbidden. Therefore building, delivering, and deploying script based release packages is essential.</p>
<p>Fortunately, OWB provides the ability to do this, due to its OMB*Plus scripting interface. And that&#8217;s even free of charge, as long as you do not call Enterprise functionality of course. ;)</p>
<p>A note regarding deployment to multiple target systems and the use of configurations. You can target several (run-time) control centers i.e. target systems with one configuration. You just have to switch the configuration&#8217;s associated control center. The painful part, of course is, that you have to switch all the actual module locations everytime you want to deploy to another system too. However, you do not have to use Enterprise functionality this way.</p>
<p>Regards Holger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp2/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,
This is a great document and the first I&#039;ve seen that looks at production deployment considerations and licensing. I think it is appalling that Oracle provides no way to turn off unlicensed features. When adding up all of the costs for OWB Enterprise, Informatica and competing products become viable alternatives despite their cost. I feel that I was &quot;bait and switched&quot; by Oracle to some extent.

This was very timely as we are deploying to production shortly. I need to reconsider our infrastructure now that I see multiple configurations are an Enterprise option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,<br />
This is a great document and the first I&#8217;ve seen that looks at production deployment considerations and licensing. I think it is appalling that Oracle provides no way to turn off unlicensed features. When adding up all of the costs for OWB Enterprise, Informatica and competing products become viable alternatives despite their cost. I feel that I was &#8220;bait and switched&#8221; by Oracle to some extent.</p>
<p>This was very timely as we are deploying to production shortly. I need to reconsider our infrastructure now that I see multiple configurations are an Enterprise option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norbert</title>
		<link>http://www.rittmanmead.com/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>Norbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rittmanmead.com/wp2/2007/02/14/running-owb10gr2-in-a-production-environment/#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,

very interessting, cause we have the same to do with our customers. Good to read your opinions.
Even I like to hear your way for automating the whole way for code promotion between development, test and prod. May you will write a little bit about that?

For your next carrier step I wish you all the best.
Regards
Norbert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>very interessting, cause we have the same to do with our customers. Good to read your opinions.<br />
Even I like to hear your way for automating the whole way for code promotion between development, test and prod. May you will write a little bit about that?</p>
<p>For your next carrier step I wish you all the best.<br />
Regards<br />
Norbert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
