Ten Thoughts on Oracle BI&DW for 2008
December 31st, 2008 by Mark Rittman
Today is New Year’s Eve, and a kind of review of the year, here’s ten of my thoughts on what happened in Oracle B&DW in 2008.
-
Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition.
2008 was the year that OBIEE went from early-adopter technology (at least for general Oracle customers) to a mainstream BI tool. A good proportion of these implementations were accompanied by the Oracle BI Applications, showing that the message of “buy vs. build” was resonating, typically with organizations who had tried building their own “first generation” DW themselves. Of course we’re still waiting for OBIEE 11g, with Answers+ being typically the 11g component (along with the web-based template builder for BI Publisher) typically being the bits that most customers are waiting for. That said, there were two major releases in the 10g codestream in 2008, with the 10.1.3.3.3 release providing Essbase support and the 10.1.3.3.4 release providing integration with EPM Workspace, as well as the new Sample Sales application that shows off development best practices. Certainly from my perspective I’m finding that customers are now implementing Oracle BI in the form of OBIEE, rather than Business Objects or Cognos, and for previous users of Discoverer there’s a lot of customer satisfaction with this new bit of technology. 2008 was a good year for Oracle BI and it’s good to have a product that finally holds it own in the marketplace. -
Essbase. Speaking of Essbase, who would have thought that this OLAP server would be the hot new technology in the Oracle world in 2008? My article on Essbase and OBIEE was in the top 10 tech articles for OTN last year, and everyone I know is either learning Essbase or dusting down their skills. Most customers I speak to who are looking to implement OBIEE also want to talk about EPM (Planning, Financial Consoidation etc) at the same time, and Essbase is the common factor that brings all of these together. Conference-wise, the biggest new area at ODTUG Kaleidoscope last year was the Essbase track, and look out for further Essbase content, together with crossover Essbase / OBIEE content, at next year’s Kaleidoscope. Now’s the time indeed to know your ASO from your BSO, your MDX from your SQL.
-
Oracle OLAP. Whilst Essbase has been grabbing the limelight, Oracle OLAP has finally delivered, six years on from the initial 9i releases, on the promise of integrated OLAP in the database. Cube Organized Materialized views have provided SELECT-level integration with SQL and query rewrite, whilst the new analytic expressions language in 11g looks likely to make it’s way into regular Oracle SQL as a way of simplifying analytic expressions. Just like Essbase and MDX will be must-have skills for Oracle BI implementors, Oracle OLAP, like materialized views, partitioning and compression, will be must-have skills for Oracle DW implementors. It’ll also be interesting to see whether Oracle OLAP gets parity with Essbase as a multi-dimensional data source in OBIEE 11g and Oracle BI Administrator 11g, if that’s the case (in terms of importing data sources) then it’ll be simple choice between in-database OLAP and external server OLAP when it comes to adding analytic horsepower to your OBIEE implementation.
-
Oracle Data Integrator. Whilst OBIEE and Essbase have been getting all the news, 2008 has been curiously quiet for Oracle Data Integrator. A rather low-key Data Quality add-in came along with the 10.1.3.4 release, but whilst I hear about the tool talked about by customers occaisionally, I don’t see many implementations. 2009 should be different though as the 10.1.3.5 release is the first to be certified with the Oracle BI Applications; I suspect judgement will be reserved until customers see how well it works as an alternative to Informatica in this scenario, a lot of which won’t be down to ODI but more down to how will it’s integrated with the DAC and how well (first time) the migrated Informatica mappings work.
-
Oracle Warehouse Builder. Whilst ODI has been pointed to as being the future of Oracle ETL, Oracle Warehouse Builder has quietly gone about becoming the default ETL tool (including the option of hand-coding) for Oracle shops. Ironically, of course, everyone now says they like it once they hear it’s being phased out or integrated with Oracle Data Integrator, and a few frustrations remain particularly around the Byzantine rules around control centers, locations, configurations and local/remote databases, but the 10.2.0.4 release was a solid one and most of the functionality new to 10.2 (Paris) now works well. I remember going into Oracle customer sites and having to persuade them to use OWB, now it’s the default, and there’s a good product management team who take the time to blog, get out to conferences and engage with the community. Truly a product success story.
-
Exadata and HP Oracle Database Machine. Of course the big news in 2008, at least from the Oracle product marketing machine, was Exadata and the Oracle Database Machine. Realistically it’s not something you’re going to buy for yourself, plug into your laptop and give it a whirl, but it addresses a market segment that Oracle clearly felt they were losing, and the geek inside all of us loves a new bit of hardware to go with our software. I think, like RAC and so on, we’ll reserve judgement until non-Oracle database specialists get their hands on it, but it was good to hear about databases, and data warehousing, at Open World in September and I suspect 2009 will bring similar groundbreaking news from the DW front.
-
Alternative Analytic DBMS Technologies. One side-effect of the Exadata announcement, at least from my perspective, was that it opened up the question as to whether new hardware types are required when working with very large data warehouse databases. At the same time, vendors such as Vertica, Netezza and ParAccel raised their profile through hiring ex-Oracle product development people, reaching out to the blogger community and advocating non-traditional hardware architectures. At this point it’s difficult to say whether they are just a flash in the pan (I wouldn’t want to predicate my business on one hardware innovation) or whether we’re experiencing a Cambrian explosion of new technologies and vendors, but it’s certainly raised the provide of VLDB and data warehouses and their particular hardware needs.
-
The Economy. Outside of Oracle of course, the big news was the economy. Will customers pull in their horns and cancel all non-critical IT projects, or will the need to innovate despite cuts in budgets mean that BI&DW is seen as the only way to work out what’s important and what’s not? Certainly (fingers crossed) we’ve found that demand for BI&DW skills has if anything gone up, as an industry we’re able to deliver value fast and of course we focus on ROI and business benefits. I suspect that unless we experience a kind of IT spending “nuclear winter” then demand for BI that “delivers” will in reality be stronger than ever in 2009, like all recessions it’s a time for innovation and rapid business change, and organizations with a good view of their business going forward as well as going back will be the ones that emerge into 2010 stronger than ever.
-
Rittman Mead. 2008 was a transformative year for us, with our team going from Jon and I up to six full-timers and a number of associates. We’ve focused on the quality of our process, delivery and methodology, and as always we share whatever we learn and try and put back into the community as much as possible. As a small and agile organization we think we’re well placed to handle whatever the economy throws at us in 2009, and we’re looking forward to delivering on our book, developing further our methodology and delivering business-changing Oracle BI&DW systems for our customers.
-
Looking to 2009. Technology-wise, 2009 will be the most significant year for product releases for many years. OBIEE 11g should be out at some point (the first half of 2009 looks most likely), with Answers+, a new scorecarding application, a metadata API for the semantic layer and the Action Frameworks amongst the new features. OWB and ODI will become further fused together, we may get some new Essbase point releases and of course the 11gR2 release of the database should at least be announced in 2009. To my mind, 2010 is likely to be the year of convergence, but 2009 will have enough new releases to keep us busy and with the betas out soon, we’ll be writing the “how-tos” and seminar material in time for the official releases.
So that’s it for 2008; thanks to everyone who’s read the blog, good luck for 2009, and see you all back here in January.

December 31st, 2008 at 2:45 pm
Thanks for the mention in #7 above, but Vertica advocates the use of traditional hardware architectures with a columnar, MPP software architecture. We do offer an appliance configuration, but it is based on industry standard hardware. We believe that traditional hardware architectures coupled with “non-traditional” software architectures are the most cost effective way to create a scalable and future proof analytic database.
January 1st, 2009 at 5:15 pm
As an Oracle Product Manager, I am always looking for this kind of info. I would have to agree with you on all of this. We have seen the same trends and are moving in some of the same directions. Good to know I am not alone out there. Thanks Mark!
January 5th, 2009 at 9:52 am
Hello Mark, I am eagerly waiting for your book on OBIEE 11g
January 9th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Mark,
From the whole OWB PM team, thanks for the kudos. :)
However, I’d like to respond to one idea here that may be misunderstood… that “ODI has been pointed to as being the future of Oracle ETL”.
A successor product, combining major elements of ODI and OWB, addressing shortcomings of each product and resolving inconsistencies between them, and offering a smooth upgrade path for both sets of customers, will be “the future” of Oracle data integration.
Michelle Bird recently presented on the future product roadmap at a BI, Warehousing and Analytics conference at Oracle HQ. Users can see more about the conference here: http://OracleBIWA.org
I’m not sure where Michelle’s presentation is available to those not attending the conference. BIWA SIG management may be willing to publish it.
While ODI receives a lot of promotional and sales effort targeting Oracle middleware, application and sometimes DB customers, OWB will continue to be an important and viable offering for data integration and data quality for Oracle database customers.
OWB 11.2 will launch with the 11.2 database with significant enhancements (many of which you’ve already seen). The product will enjoy the same kind of PM support it’s had all along, Oracle University will offer classes around the product, the support organization will continue, etc..
ODI will of course also continue to occupy a very prominent place in our data integration product line. As my focus has historically been on OWB, though, I will refrain from commenting on that– perhaps an ODI-oriented PM will want to make more specific comments.
Any customer looking at a choice of ETL product should feel confident that both options are a safe path to the future, and investment in either product will be protected.
We expect to articulate our future plans around data integration more clearly in the near future in a way that will clarify for customers the place for both ODI and OWB going forward, and which products suit their needs best now and in the future. Keep an eye on our blog (http://blogs.oracle.com/warehousebuilder/) for updated information.
Thanks again for the attention,
-Antonio Romero, Senior PM, Oracle Data Integration
January 12th, 2009 at 8:04 pm
Thanks Mark,
It was great read, makes me feel more relaxed and proud of our OBIEE and Essbase implementation in 2008.
We are in second phase of implementation of OBIEE & Essbase and debate being which platform, specially Windows vs Linux/Unix.
Do you have any pros or cons for each one of them, any recommendations.
Thanks
Danish
January 16th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
@Danish
I think when it comes to Windows vs. Linux, I think the answer is to use the platform you’re most comfortable with, the one that you can easiest support. Whilst Windows is probably a bit easier (for me) to administer, some customers like Linux and the command line and prefer to work in that environment. You might also find it easier (or cheaper) to scale with Linux, but in my opinion there’s not a lot in it really (at least at the BI tool server tier of your architecture).
regards,
Mark
February 3rd, 2009 at 7:19 pm
Mark – I am in Oracle’s EPM GBU so its great to read your take on the impact and importance of Essbase and EPM. I thought your comments on last year’s Kaleidoscope were spot on too. One of my roles is working with the User Groups and the ODTUG team has put together even more comprehensive and outstanding Essbase content for Kaleidoscope 09. I think its now up to 90+ hours of Essbase content. Here’s the link to the abstracts in case you and your readers wanted to drill down in detail.
http://www.odtugkaleidoscope.com/Essbase.html
Cheers,
Mark
April 3rd, 2009 at 6:38 am
Thanks Mark for sharing your valuable insights for the coming year. I am a Oracle BI Consultant and consistently visit your blog. I would be thankful if you could share some thoughts on the incentives/advantages for customers choosing OBIEE over BO (as discussed in point #1) and also, are there a substantial number of customer presently using BO and looking to shift to OBIEE as their BI platform.
Regards,
Sumit