Comments on: Oracle BI EE 10.1.3.4.1 – Modeling Measure Dimensions on Relational Sources – Essbase Style http://www.rittmanmead.com/2010/02/03/oracle-bi-ee-10-1-3-4-1-modeling-measure-dimensions-on-relational-sources-essbase-style/ Delivered Intelligence Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:54:00 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Marcin http://www.rittmanmead.com/2010/02/03/oracle-bi-ee-10-1-3-4-1-modeling-measure-dimensions-on-relational-sources-essbase-style/comment-page-1/#comment-12363 Marcin Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:25:20 +0000 http://www.rittmanmead.com/?p=4287#comment-12363 Hi Venkat, Great article! I have similar business requirement to implement. What would be then the proper way of implementing a measure dimension if all measures are in one fact table? You don't recommend adding separate LTS for each measure. Should this measure dimension be introduced already in physical model? Fact table would consist then of only one generic measure? Regards Marcin Hi Venkat,

Great article! I have similar business requirement to implement. What would be then the proper way of implementing a measure dimension if all measures are in one fact table? You don’t recommend adding separate LTS for each measure. Should this measure dimension be introduced already in physical model? Fact table would consist then of only one generic measure?

Regards
Marcin

]]> By: Christian http://www.rittmanmead.com/2010/02/03/oracle-bi-ee-10-1-3-4-1-modeling-measure-dimensions-on-relational-sources-essbase-style/comment-page-1/#comment-11937 Christian Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:14:18 +0000 http://www.rittmanmead.com/?p=4287#comment-11937 Hi Venkat, That actually made me laugh out loud. Excellent! :-D Next challenge the opposite: flatten Essbase hierarchies ;-) Take care, Christian Hi Venkat,

That actually made me laugh out loud. Excellent! :-D

Next challenge the opposite: flatten Essbase hierarchies ;-)

Take care,
Christian

]]>